Pages

Showing posts with label #412. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #412. Show all posts

Sunday, October 9, 2016

No Need for Anxiety: the Who, What , When and Why of Evaluation and Assessment

It is the thing that we tend to despise the most, but one of the things that is most necessary in education:  assessment and evaluation. This week’s readings focused on the who, what, when and why of assessment. 

Who: 

This is a perfect representation of how we can ensure
our assessments and evaluations are reliable and relevant.
http://www.ulm.edu/assessment/
We usually think of assessment and evaluation just being about students and grades, and it is, but it also is for teachers, schools and communities.  Evaluations help keep teachers and students accountable to their schools and communities. Grades are a specific way this is reported, but none the less, it is an important accountability piece.  These assessments also help us as teachers when we plan curriculum for a unit or a course, this backward planning will ensure that objectives are linked to assessment questions.  The various types of evaluations give students an opportunity to assess themselves on a project, lab or even correct written tests to anchor and re-evaluate learning. 

What:

“Assessment is used to evaluate the strengths and needs of learners, guide instruction, and measure progress and achievement” it is also “assessing what students have learned.”  Although these are the definitions of assessment, there are various methods to assess and evaluate student learning and performance. 
  • Pre-test/Needs Assessment- I am starting to realize this is essential.  If I don’t know where students are at before the next topic or unit, then I could be missing many of them.
  • Written Evaluations- These should be based off of course objectives. They can be multiple-choice, short answer, true-false and/or essay
  • Rubrics- Rubrics can be used in combination with many other assessment tools.  I will be using a rubric for my floriculture unit, as a project will be evaluated along with other portions of the assessment.  This is an area I look forward to exploring and trying as I student teach, but also finding ways to make it simple for grading is essential. 
  •  Task-Lists & Check Lists- I can see these being a large part of all of my labs.  In agricultural mechanics classes this is one of the best ways to evaluate students.  If this is combined with an end of unit or mid/end of course rubric or project evaluation, it would make it even more reliable of an assessment tool. 
  •  Self Assessments & Direct Observation- I combined these two because I like the idea of doing both.  I have seen Mr. Masser keep notes of how students are performing in lab as they go about their procedures, this is part of their grade.  Doing this, but also allowing for a short personal reflection and checklist.  This could help students see where behavior expectations

When:

One thing that stood out to me when reviewing when to assess and evaluate students was length of assessments.  The longer the test, specifically written test, the more comprehensive it is and it is typically more reliable.  Time between material and evaluation should also be taken into account.  If various forms of short quizzes are given throughout a unit, then a longer unit assessment is not necessary.  Lab and practicum evaluations should also be written so they are conscious of time that it will take to perform evaluations for each of the students.  One of the readings gave a suggestion to

Why:

Part of this is because it is required, but it is required for good reason, as long as it does what is supposed to do.  The why can be summed up in a few questions, which will help me self-check my assessment and evaluation methods.
  1. Is summative or formative assessment necessary at this point?
  2. Am I assessing what I want to assess? And how am I communicating that?
  3. Do my assessment or evaluation techniques provide answers to essential questions and objectives previously written and taught? 
  4. Can students demonstrate what they have learned?
  5. Is this appropriate for students abilities and academic and educational goals- and is it transparent? 
  6. Is this assessment realistic to what a student would do in a career setting? 
  7. Do specific students need accommodations or modifications?



Thursday, August 25, 2016

AEE412 Lab 1: Reflective Teaching Lesson

This week we participated in our first teaching lab, but we did things a little differently.  We were paired together, and one teammate was responsible for teaching the lesson and the other was responsible for coaching.  This was interesting and challenging because I so badly wanted to teach and try a lesson, but I know sometimes it's good to sit back and take a different role.  

Our Task: 
  • Teach a lesson/Collaborate with your coaching partner
Our Lesson:  (Evelyn's Lesson!)
  • Teach students a new language (hieroglyphics), and try to have as many students as possible to use the new hieroglyphic language to translate a paragraph.  
The paragraph that the students had to translate was all about what it takes to learn how to read, or understand a language.  So yes, the lesson itself made no sense, but with context, it does.  "Contextual learning helps student's process new information that is given to them in a way that makes sense to them in their own world of memory, experience and response (Parnell, 1995).  This 'frame of reference' and setting the context was necessary in these lessons.   Before teaching we learned all about the content of our lesson, but forgot about the context part until we got to class.  We talked it over and then she added it in.  The context is extremely important.  

Again, this was our first lab and with that come fears, "what about this", "should I try this", "what if I fail?".  But isn't that what it is about?  Try something, then unpack it and see what went well, see what can be improved upon?  Feedback is sometimes an uncomfortable thing, but there is no growth in a comfort zone and no comfort in a growth zone, and I know this class will always be a growth zone, even when I am not the one teaching.  


After working through the first lab and working through the first week of classes there are some things I am looking forward to diving into...allow me to explain.

1. Differentiated/Individual Instruction- We all come to the table with different experiences and abilities, how do we share in that and all grow?  More than that, how do I do this for my students- teach to the mass, yet teach to the individuals? 

2. How do I manage my time yet still meet the need of my desire for more?  I leave wanting more, more time, more information, and a desire to ask more questions, or discuss more.  Yet I have an entire 'To-Do' List to tackle.  How do I balance this? 

3. Feedback.  We were asked to capture down feedback and a peer in lab asked me after for some feedback.  But what constitutes as good feedback for teaching?  I am looking forward to learning are the things that I question or that bother me, do they matter?  Or are they the small things?  And then how do I take and implement the feedback I will receive. 



Overall it has been a great first week thus far, and I look forward to what is next as I prepare for those students next semester and beyond. 

Yours on the road to becoming Ms.Hack.